Startups & Business

Klarna valuation struggles despite Apple partnership and profit gains

Klarna revenue reached $1.042 billion in the second quarter of 2026, marking a 27% increase despite a significant stock price correction from its post-IPO highs. The company is pivoting toward credit utility through the Apple Upgrade program and growing its membership base.

Klarna valuation struggles despite Apple partnership and profit gains

The price correction and the Apple deal

Klarna shares closed at $18.94 on July 31, 2026, after dropping from a post-IPO high of $45.48. This price stays well below the $40 per share IPO price from September 2025. I view the current valuation as a massive correction. The July 28 launch of the Apple Upgrade program, where Klarna acts as the lessor for iPhone and Mac leases, moves the company away from being a simple payments app and closer to a credit utility. Goldman Sachs raised its target for KLAR to $25 in July despite the volatility. This target ignores the fact that the stock still trades at a fraction of its $45.6 billion peak from 2021. Apple Upgrade replaces the old iPhone Upgrade Program and places the underwriting responsibility for hardware leases on Klarna. The September 2025 IPO raised $1.37 billion through the sale of 34.3 million shares. This offering was oversubscribed by more than 20 times. On its opening day, the stock opened at $52, which was 30% above the $40 offering price. This debut gave the company a market valuation of $17 billion at the time. Sequoia Capital, which holds 21% of Klarna’s voting shares, saw its total returns reach approximately $2.65 billion after its cumulative $500 million investment. I find the volatility in this stock typical for fintechs, yet the drop from $45.48 to $18.94 is extreme.

Improving earnings and consumer engagement

The August 18, 2026, earnings report shows a sustained profitability turnaround. Revenue reached $1.042 billion in the second quarter, a 27% increase over the same period last year. Adjusted operating income hit $91 million, which is a 214% rise from the previous year. Net income grew to $9 million, overcoming the $53 million loss reported in the second quarter of 2025. Transaction margin dollars grew 42% to $446 million. I see these numbers as proof that the pivot to high-frequency products, like Klarna Memberships which reached 2 million paying subscribers, works. The company has 120 million active consumers, which adds 9 million users compared to the previous year. Merchant numbers also climbed 54% year-over-year to 1.2 million. Most recently, J.P. Morgan Payments went live, allowing its massive merchant base to offer the full Klarna suite. The company also updated its full-year 2026 guidance, lowering its GMV target to between $149 billion and $151 billion due to currency translation and lower German volumes. This adjustment follows a trend in the German retail market. Credit quality remains a focus, with provisions for credit losses at 0.52% of GMV. This exceeds the 0.56% reported in the second quarter of 2025. The Klarna Card also reached 6.5 million active users.

Assessing the bull and bear cases

Investors face a divide between a $12 bear case and a $25 bull case. I find the $12 floor plausible if the Apple relationship fails or if consumer credit losses rise. The company faces a €500 million Dutch claim regarding pay-later loans, which creates significant regulatory risk. You should note the difference in scale between Klarna and its US rival Affirm.

Metric Klarna (Q2 2026) Affirm (FY Q4 2025)
Revenue $1.042 billion $876 million
GMV/Loan Sales $36.6 billion $10.4 billion
Revenue/Sales % 2.85% 8.42%

Klarna’s revenue is 2.85% of its $36.6 billion GMV, while Affirm’s revenue is 8.42% of its $10.4 billion loan product sales. Affirm reported a 33% revenue jump in fiscal Q4 2025 and a 43% rise in GMV. Its revenue reached $876 million, while its loan product sales totaled $10.4 billion. I would skip the optimism if the company cannot stabilize its earnings against rising credit losses. Does the heavy reliance on Apple’s hardware cycles create a ceiling for long-term growth?